I don't know why I am now having problems with the added "=" "=20="...
Anyway this is the information on Burril J Haggard:
Estate of Haggard, Burril J
Mississippi County, MO
Added to Mosley Family Tree by uggieG on 19 Sep 2010
"HAGGARD, Burril J. (deceased)
Estate #707, Box #20
Admr: Felix L. MILLS. Bond date 10 Aug. 1850. Bdm: David M. YOUNGS &
Hamilton W. SITES. Bond amt $500. Apprs: William W. WOODARD, Zadoc MASON,
& Bennet POPLIN. Heirs: Eliza HAGGARD, widow; William H. HAGGARD, Ann E.
HAGGARD, & Marietta HAGGARD, minor children.
disposed of 8 Mar. 1859."
SO - the persons listed with Rebecca (Cooley) Haggard on the 1850 MO census
are the above heirs.
Mary C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Lou Cooley
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:08 AM
To: John Cooley Mailing List
Subject: Burril J Haggard
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CF2CFE.4DD4C9E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
One family tree on Ancestry.com lists Eliza Haggard and the 3 Haggard =
children listed with Rebecca Haggard on the 1850 census as the wife and =
children of Burril J Haggard. =20
Any ideas? =20
Mary C.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CF2CFE.4DD4C9E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=3Dltr>
<DIV dir=3Dltr>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>One family tree on Ancestry.com lists Eliza Haggard and the 3 =
Haggard=20
children listed with Rebecca Haggard on the 1850 census as the wife and =
children=20
of Burril J Haggard. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Any ideas? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Mary C. </DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CF2CFE.4DD4C9E0--
--
<a href="http://newsummer.com/distlist">distlist 0.9b</a>
See http://johncooley.net/list for list information.
Received on Wed Feb 19 2014 - 16:32:59 CST