Interesting DNA rest results

From: Michael Cooley <michael_at_newsummer.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:08:54 -0500

I think that we now have convincing evidence that Daniel Cooley was not
the son of John! The Cooley/Hardin tester matches 33/37 to the Daniel
tester. And the second tester now in CF13--who was from the same area of
Oregon as Daniel's tester--*looks* to be an exact match! (I haven't yet
done a *close* one-to-one connection.)

More work certainly needs to be done, but I feel confident that Daniel
should be removed from the Stokes County tree.

Congrats to the Cooley/Hardin crowd! If Daniel was not John's father, he
was probably an uncle. It's time to cast the DNA net wide to see who else
might be snared!

-Michael

-- 
VP, the Cooley Family Association of America
Administrator, the Akins DNA Project
Administrator, the Ashenhurst DNA Project
Administrator, the Bishop DNA Project
Administrator, the Eldridge DNA Project
Administrator, the Fisk DNA Project
Administrator, the alt-McDowell DNA Project
Co-Administrator, the Cooley DNA Project
Co-Administrator, the McDougall DNA Project
Co-Administrator, the Pickens DNA Project
Co-Administrator, the Strother DNA Project
Instructor, the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI)
B.A. Humboldt State University, History

Received on Wed Jul 23 2014 - 13:08:54 CDT