Hi Bonnie,
This kind of testing traces only the paternal line, from a male tester to
his father, his father, his father, etc. There are several strengths: The
Y ( having the male gene) typically has a small single mutation about
every 150 years; therefore, it remain stable for very many generations, as
we witness with the Hackett tester and Don Cooley's test, despite the fact
that the two lines split about 800 years ago.
-Michael
On Sat, August 8, 2015 22:20, Bonnie & Craig Lillywhite wrote:
> Michael, I did receive this email and do appreciate your interest and
> hard work! I know practically nothing about this type of research (the
> SNP's
> etc). I assume it would not be helpful for any of us females with Cooley
> ancestry to get tested. But if I'm wrong, please let me know. I am
> descended from James Cooley (1772-1821) through his daughter, Jemima, who
> married Thomas Kirkland White. Bonnie Wade Lillywhite
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Lois Cooley <loiscool_at_charter.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Michael, I am receiving your emails. Not sure I follow all of this but
>> one of these days I will figure it out. Thanks for doing all of
>> this... Lois
>> [married to Dennis Cooley, son of Robert Cooley (1917-2006), son of
>> Louis
>> Cooley(1897-1960), son of George Cooley (1871-1948, son of Abraham
>> Cooley
>> (1832-1895), son of Stephen (1805-1872), son of Edward (1763-1822) son
>> of John (1740-1811) - according to my records]
>>
>>
>> Lois Cooley
>> Greer, SC 29651
>> (864) 476-9585
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Cooley [mailto:michael_at_newsummer.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:36 PM
>> To: John Cooley Mailing List <undisclosed.recipients_at_johncooley.net>
>> Subject: Big Y ordered
>>
>>
>> I've ordered the Big Y, more than 10 million positions are tested
>> looking for newly discovered SNPs (mutations). The Y-STRs we've looked
>> at are great for determining general family groupings. We now know
>> without reservation, for example, that our Cooley clan is not related to
>> the Benjamin clan. But they don't tell us to what degree the
>> Pennsylvania CF01s are related to us.
>> We know from the Hackett results that the connection may go back several
>> hundred years, perhaps more than a thousand.
>>
>> I've provided a graph I hope will aid in the understanding of this:
>>
>>
>> http://ancestraldata.com/staging/cooley-hackett-SNP.html
>>
>>
>> Just like genealogical trees, every point branches out, eventually
>> resembling a tangled network than a hierarchical tree. But here we're
>> following one branch down to about 1250 AD when the Cooley/Hackett line
>> splits into two.
>>
>> The SNPs in the pink box were unknown until the Cooley/Hackett tests.
>> More
>> testers from other lineages are needed to discover how they are to be
>> arranged (did YP4249 mutate before or after YP4210?). From all that we
>> know about the relationship between Don and myself, I will have those
>> same SNPs.
>>
>> But here's the good part: Most of the SNPs above Don's name also came
>> to him through John, having came to John, in turn, since the development
>> of the "pink" SNPs. (We know that because the Hackett tester has none of
>> them.) When I test, most of my SNPs that are other than the pink and
>> above will look like Don's unknown SNPs. Those we share will be given
>> names and will be assigned as having belonged to John. We will then have
>> a long line from way back to the birth of John. What's left will have
>> come down to Don or me since the birth of John's sons James and Edward,
>> respectively.
>>
>> What will this mean to our research? We'll have a list of markers from
>> 1950 (my birth) and 1952 (Don's birth) going back to the literal Dawn of
>> Man. Once one of the "Pennsylvania" Cooleys tests, we'll be able to
>> place him along that continuum of SNPs. It wouldn't be a precise
>> measurement, but it should tell us whether they are closely related
>> (meaning what, I'm not
>> sure) or displaced by X number of centuries.
>>
>> ONE UNRELATED ITEM: I made some changes to my email filters. I'm now
>> getting a lot less spam but, it seems, fewer personal emails, too. I'd
>> like some of you to respond to this, especially to my personal email
>> address, to get a sense whether things are working correctly.
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>>
>> - Administrator or Co-Administrator for the following family DNA
>> projects:
>> Akins, Ashenhurst, Bishop, Eldridge, Fisk, alt-McDowell, Cooley,
>> McDougall,
>> Pickens, Strother - B.A. Humboldt State University, History,
>> 2013 - Instructor, the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI) at HSU
>>
>>
>> --
>> <a href="http://newsummer.com/distlist">distlist 0.9b</a> See
>> http://johncooley.net/list for list information.
>>
>>
>> --
>> <a href="http://newsummer.com/distlist">distlist 0.9b</a>
>> See http://johncooley.net/list for list information.
>>
>>
>
--
- Administrator or Co-Administrator for the following family DNA projects:
Akins, Ashenhurst, Bishop, Eldridge, Fisk, alt-McDowell, Cooley,
McDougall, Pickens, Strother - B.A. Humboldt State University, History,
2013 - Instructor, the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI) at HSU
Received on Sun Aug 09 2015 - 18:07:58 CDT